TY - JOUR
T1 - Computational indeterminacy and explanations in cognitive science
AU - Papayannopoulos, Philippos
AU - Fresco, Nir
AU - Shagrir, Oron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Computational physical systems may exhibit indeterminacy of computation (IC). Their identified physical dynamics may not suffice to select a unique computational profile. We consider this phenomenon from the point of view of cognitive science and examine how computational profiles of cognitive systems are identified and justified in practice, in the light of IC. To that end, we look at the literature on the underdetermination of theory by evidence and argue that the same devices that can be successfully employed to confirm physical hypotheses can also be used to rationally single out computational profiles, notwithstanding IC.
AB - Computational physical systems may exhibit indeterminacy of computation (IC). Their identified physical dynamics may not suffice to select a unique computational profile. We consider this phenomenon from the point of view of cognitive science and examine how computational profiles of cognitive systems are identified and justified in practice, in the light of IC. To that end, we look at the literature on the underdetermination of theory by evidence and argue that the same devices that can be successfully employed to confirm physical hypotheses can also be used to rationally single out computational profiles, notwithstanding IC.
KW - Computational explanations
KW - Computational individuation
KW - Indeterminacy of computation
KW - Underdetermination of theory by evidence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141475802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10539-022-09877-8
DO - 10.1007/s10539-022-09877-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85141475802
SN - 0169-3867
VL - 37
JO - Biology and Philosophy
JF - Biology and Philosophy
IS - 6
M1 - 47
ER -