Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery: Incremental shift or paradigm change?

Leo Joskowicz*, Eric J. Hazan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) is now about 25 years old. Unlike Neurosurgery, Computer Aided Surgery has not become the standard of care in Orthopaedic Surgery. In this paper, we provide the technical and clinical context raised by this observation in an attempt to elucidate the reasons for this state of affairs. We start with a brief outline of the history of CAOS, review the main CAOS technologies, and describe how they are evaluated. We then identify some of the current publications in the field and present the opposing views on their clinical impact and their acceptance by the orthopaedic community worldwide. We focus on total knee replacement surgery as a case study and present current clinical results and contrasting opinions on CAOS technologies. We then discuss the challenges and opportunities for research in medical image analysis in CAOS and in musculoskeletal radiology. We conclude with a suggestion that while CAOS acceptance may be more moderate than that of other fields in surgery, it still has a place in the arsenal of useful tools available to orthopaedic surgeons.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Image Analysis
Volume33
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Image guided surgery
  • Medical robotics
  • Review article for 20th anniversary issue

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Computer Aided Orthopaedic Surgery: Incremental shift or paradigm change?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this