TY - JOUR
T1 - Consciousness without report
T2 - Insights from summary statistics and inattention 'blindness'
AU - Usher, Marius
AU - Bronfman, Zohar Z.
AU - Talmor, Shiri
AU - Jacobson, Hilla
AU - Eitam, Baruch
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/19
Y1 - 2018/9/19
N2 - We contrast two theoretical positions on the relation between phenomenal and access consciousness. First, we discuss previous data supporting a mild Overflow position, according to which transient visual awareness can overflow report. These data are open to two interpretations: (i) observers transiently experience specific visual elements outside attentional focus without encoding them into working memory; (ii) no specific visual elements but only statistical summaries are experienced in such conditions. We present new data showing that under data-limited conditions observers cannot discriminate a simple relation (same versus different) without discriminating the elements themselves and, based on additional computational considerations, we argue that this supports the first interpretation: summary statistics (same/different) are grounded on the transient experience of elements. Second, we examine recent data from a variant of 'inattention blindness' and argue that contrary to widespread assumptions, it provides further support for Overflow by highlighting another factor, 'task relevance', which affects the ability to conceptualize and report (but not experience) visual elements. This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.
AB - We contrast two theoretical positions on the relation between phenomenal and access consciousness. First, we discuss previous data supporting a mild Overflow position, according to which transient visual awareness can overflow report. These data are open to two interpretations: (i) observers transiently experience specific visual elements outside attentional focus without encoding them into working memory; (ii) no specific visual elements but only statistical summaries are experienced in such conditions. We present new data showing that under data-limited conditions observers cannot discriminate a simple relation (same versus different) without discriminating the elements themselves and, based on additional computational considerations, we argue that this supports the first interpretation: summary statistics (same/different) are grounded on the transient experience of elements. Second, we examine recent data from a variant of 'inattention blindness' and argue that contrary to widespread assumptions, it provides further support for Overflow by highlighting another factor, 'task relevance', which affects the ability to conceptualize and report (but not experience) visual elements. This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.
KW - Attention
KW - Consciousness
KW - Inattentional blindness
KW - Psychophysics
KW - Summary statistics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051557099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2017.0354
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2017.0354
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 30061467
AN - SCOPUS:85051557099
SN - 0962-8436
VL - 373
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1755
M1 - 20170354
ER -