Abstract
Recent advances in biotechnologies have led to the development of multiplex genomic and proteomic analyses for clinical use. Nevertheless, guidelines are currently lacking to determine which molecular assays should be implemented in metastatic cancers. The first MAP conference was dedicated to exploring the use of genomics to better select therapies in the treatment of metastatic cancers. Sixteen consensus items were covered. There was a consensus that new technologies like next-generation sequencing of tumors and ddPCR on circulating free DNA have convincing analytical validity. Further work needs to be undertaken to establish the clinical utility of liquid biopsies and the added clinical value of expanding from individual gene tests into large gene panels. Experts agreed that standardized bioinformatics methods for biological interpretation of genomic data are needed and that precision medicine trials should be stratified based on the level of evidence available for the genomic alterations identified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1443-1448 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Annals of Oncology |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Aug 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Biomarkers
- Consensus
- Precision medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus on precision medicine for metastatic cancers: A report from the MAP conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver