Abstract
Why do some subnational governments consent to the centralization of fiscal authority? This article’s explanatory framework is built on the cases of Argentina and Australia. It adopts an inverse perspective to explain why subnational entities in these two cases assented to revenue centralization during moments of sudden economic change. In the case of Argentina, subnational abdication of revenue powers has unexpectedly resulted in a more predictable and formalized fiscal co-responsibility. By contrast, in Australia, the abdication of borrowing powers and the permanent loss of income tax revenue following a temporary delegation have unexpectedly caused a large vertical fiscal accountability gap.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 453-470 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Argentina
- Australia
- comparative political economy
- fiscal federalism
- paired comparison
- subnational analysis
- taxation powers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consenting to Centralization? Comparing the Subnational Delegation and Abdication of Fiscal Authority in Argentina and Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver