Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consenting to Centralization? Comparing the Subnational Delegation and Abdication of Fiscal Authority in Argentina and Australia

  • Tracy Beck Fenwick*
  • , Jorge P. Gordin
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Why do some subnational governments consent to the centralization of fiscal authority? This article’s explanatory framework is built on the cases of Argentina and Australia. It adopts an inverse perspective to explain why subnational entities in these two cases assented to revenue centralization during moments of sudden economic change. In the case of Argentina, subnational abdication of revenue powers has unexpectedly resulted in a more predictable and formalized fiscal co-responsibility. By contrast, in Australia, the abdication of borrowing powers and the permanent loss of income tax revenue following a temporary delegation have unexpectedly caused a large vertical fiscal accountability gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-470
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • comparative political economy
  • fiscal federalism
  • paired comparison
  • subnational analysis
  • taxation powers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consenting to Centralization? Comparing the Subnational Delegation and Abdication of Fiscal Authority in Argentina and Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this