Abstract
This paper defends the view that both constitutional provisions—norms that are not dependent on our choices—and statutory provisions—norms that are contingent on our choices—are necessary features of a liberal democracy. We make the case for institution-dependent goods, arguing that some goods depend for their existence on being produced by the right law-making institution with its own characteristic deliberative process. Hence, we conclude that individuals may sometimes have an interest (or even a right) that their legal rights be protected by a certain institution, say, the legislature, rather than another, say, the constitution, and vice versa.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 118-134 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Legal Analysis |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutionalism and majoritarianism reconciled'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver