Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constitutionalism and majoritarianism reconciled

  • Avihay Dorfman*
  • , Alon Harel
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper defends the view that both constitutional provisions—norms that are not dependent on our choices—and statutory provisions—norms that are contingent on our choices—are necessary features of a liberal democracy. We make the case for institution-dependent goods, arguing that some goods depend for their existence on being produced by the right law-making institution with its own characteristic deliberative process. Hence, we conclude that individuals may sometimes have an interest (or even a right) that their legal rights be protected by a certain institution, say, the legislature, rather than another, say, the constitution, and vice versa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-134
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Legal Analysis
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutionalism and majoritarianism reconciled'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this