Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

  • Antonio Palumbo*
  • , Roman Hajek
  • , Michel Delforge
  • , Martin Kropff
  • , Maria Teresa Petrucci
  • , John Catalano
  • , Heinz Gisslinger
  • , Wiesław Wiktor-Jȩdrzejczak
  • , Mamia Zodelava
  • , Katja Weisel
  • , Nicola Cascavilla
  • , Genadi Iosava
  • , Michele Cavo
  • , Janusz Kloczko
  • , Joan Bladé
  • , Meral Beksac
  • , Ivan Spicka
  • , Torben Plesner
  • , Joergen Radke
  • , Christian Langer
  • Dina Ben Yehuda, Alessandro Corso, Lindsay Herbein, Zhinuan Yu, Jay Mei, Christian Jacques, Meletios A. Dimopoulos
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

701 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide has tumoricidal and immunomodulatory activity against multiple myeloma. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized study compared melphalan-prednisone- lenalidomide induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R) with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) or melphalan-prednisone (MP) followed by placebo in patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who were ineligible for transplantation to receive MPR-R (nine 4-week cycles of MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until a relapse or disease progression occurred [152 patients]) or to receive MPR (153 patients) or MP (154 patients) without maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 30 months. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with MPR-R (31 months) than with MPR (14 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P<0.001) or MP (13 months; hazard ratio, 0.40; P<0.001). Response rates were superior with MPR-R and MPR (77% and 68%, respectively, vs. 50% with MP; P<0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively, for the comparison with MP). The progression-free survival benefit associated with MPR-R was noted in patients 65 to 75 years of age but not in those older than 75 years of age (P = 0.001 for treatment-by-age interaction). After induction therapy, a landmark analysis showed a 66% reduction in the rate of progression with MPR-R (hazard ratio for the comparison with MPR, 0.34; P<0.001) that was age-independent. During induction therapy, the most frequent adverse events were hematologic; grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 35%, 32%, and 8% of the patients in the MPR-R, MPR, and MP groups, respectively. The 3-year rate of second primary tumors was 7% with MPR-R, 7% with MPR, and 3% with MP. CONCLUSIONS: MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the greatest benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age. (Funded by Celgene; MM-015 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00405756.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1759-1769
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume366
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 May 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this