Abstract
We show that many-to-one matching markets with contracts where colleges’ preferences satisfy the hidden substitutes condition of Hatfield and Kominers (2015)may not be embedded, in the sense of Echenique (2012)into a Kelso and Crawford(1982)matching-with-salaries market. Our proof relies on a configurations of preferences that is observed in many college admissions markets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 40-42 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Economics Letters |
| Volume | 181 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019
Keywords
- Matching
- Matching with contracts
- Matching with salaries
- embedding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contracts are not salaries in the hidden-substitutes domain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver