TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrasting Behavior of Antifreeze Proteins
T2 - Ice Growth Inhibitors and Ice Nucleation Promoters
AU - Eickhoff, Lukas
AU - Dreischmeier, Katharina
AU - Zipori, Assaf
AU - Sirotinskaya, Vera
AU - Adar, Chen
AU - Reicher, Naama
AU - Braslavsky, Ido
AU - Rudich, Yinon
AU - Koop, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2019/3/7
Y1 - 2019/3/7
N2 - Several types of natural molecules interact specifically with ice crystals. Small antifreeze proteins (AFPs) adsorb to particular facets of ice crystals, thus inhibiting their growth, whereas larger ice-nucleating proteins (INPs) can trigger the formation of new ice crystals at temperatures much higher than the homogeneous ice nucleation temperature of pure water. It has been proposed that both types of proteins interact similarly with ice and that, in principle, they may be able to exhibit both functions. Here we investigated two naturally occurring antifreeze proteins, one from fish, type-III AFP, and one from beetles, TmAFP. We show that in addition to ice growth inhibition, both can also trigger ice nucleation above the homogeneous freezing temperature, providing unambiguous experimental proof for their contrasting behavior. Our analysis suggests that the predominant difference between AFPs and INPs is their molecular size, which is a very good predictor of their ice nucleation temperature.
AB - Several types of natural molecules interact specifically with ice crystals. Small antifreeze proteins (AFPs) adsorb to particular facets of ice crystals, thus inhibiting their growth, whereas larger ice-nucleating proteins (INPs) can trigger the formation of new ice crystals at temperatures much higher than the homogeneous ice nucleation temperature of pure water. It has been proposed that both types of proteins interact similarly with ice and that, in principle, they may be able to exhibit both functions. Here we investigated two naturally occurring antifreeze proteins, one from fish, type-III AFP, and one from beetles, TmAFP. We show that in addition to ice growth inhibition, both can also trigger ice nucleation above the homogeneous freezing temperature, providing unambiguous experimental proof for their contrasting behavior. Our analysis suggests that the predominant difference between AFPs and INPs is their molecular size, which is a very good predictor of their ice nucleation temperature.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062334814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03719
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03719
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30742446
AN - SCOPUS:85062334814
SN - 1948-7185
VL - 10
SP - 966
EP - 972
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
IS - 5
ER -