Coping strategies of engagement and avoidance: the case of Jerusalem

I. Sharkansky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

"Coping' has been used to describe the management of difficult problems in politics and policy making, typically without systematic concern for the various meanings of the concept. Psychologists have been more precise than political scientists in seeking to define coping. They have identified numerous coping behaviours as responses to stress, grouped them into categories, and constructed hypotheses linking coping behaviours with outcomes. While much might be learned from further specification of coping behaviours, coping is likely to remain a concept whose multiple meanings and ambiguities convey something of the setting that stimulates coping. An analysis of policy making for Jerusalem illustrates both the insights that can be derived from the concept of coping, and its limitations. -Author

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-101
Number of pages11
JournalPolicy and Politics
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coping strategies of engagement and avoidance: the case of Jerusalem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this