Abstract
The reported 27% savings of price-responsive charging in the abstract and section 4.2 was incorrect, with the correct value being 21%. Also, in section 3.4, the savings of CO2 emissions for emission-responsive charging is 82% and not 81.4% (as correctly reported in Table 1). In the labeling of Figure 3, the right axis is shown with a red line and the left axis with a blue line, consistent with the graphical legend. Apart from these corrections in the reported numbers, none of the conclusions or simulations are affected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4459 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Environmental Science and Technology |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 10 Feb 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to “Emission-Responsive Charging of Electric Cars and Carsharing to Improve the Security of Electricity Supply for Switzerland”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver