Correction to: Timing of midstream urine culture before endourological procedure—can we do better?—A comparative study (Urolithiasis, (2023), 51, 1, (110), 10.1007/s00240-023-01483-x)

Matan Mekayten, Eliyahu M. Heifetz, Yishai Sompolinsky, Amitay Lorber, Mordechai Duvdevani, Jacob Strahilevitz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. In the section ‘’Predicting sepsis’’, last sentence of the first paragraph which previously read: Additional variables that were significantly associated with sepsis were bladder outlet obstruction and a history of recent fank pain (Table 3 in supplements). and should have read: Additional variables that were significantly associated with sepsis were bladder outlet obstruction and a history of recent flank pain (Table 3). The original article has been corrected.

Original languageAmerican English
Article number116
JournalUrolithiasis
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Sep 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Timing of midstream urine culture before endourological procedure—can we do better?—A comparative study (Urolithiasis, (2023), 51, 1, (110), 10.1007/s00240-023-01483-x)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this