Corrective and Distributive Justice: From Aristotle to Modern Times

Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Corrective and Distributive Justice: From Aristotle to Modern Times retraces the intricate history of the distinction between corrective and distributive justice. This distinction is elaborated in the 5th book of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, which was rediscovered in Western Europe in the 12th and 13th centuries by the Scholastics and turned into a central topic in legal and theological scholarship. After a decline of interest in the wake of the enlightenment and secularization, a surprising revival of these notions of justice occurred in U.S. legal and philosophical discourse during the last four decades that has made this distinction a central issue in tort law, restitution and other important fields of private and public law. In literally hundreds of articles and a considerable number of books, the Aristotelian distinction has been elaborated, discussed, and applied. Englard's unique contribution to this aspect of legal history grants the contemporary reader a historical perspective that is vital for a deepened understanding of the distinction and modern concerns. Organized chronologically, Englard's research covers: Aristotle, High Scholastics, Late Scholastics, Post-Scholastics, and Modernity. The relevant literature is notoriously difficult to access, not only because of its Latin language, but because of the physical rarity of the relevant books scattered throughout the world. This book offers the modern reader a touchstone synthesis of intellectual and legal history.

Original languageEnglish
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages237
ISBN (Electronic)9780197718797
ISBN (Print)9780195380071
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrective and Distributive Justice: From Aristotle to Modern Times'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this