Corruption again, and again not decisive

Ira Sharkansky*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Corruption was prominent in the run-up to the 2009 election, but did not affect the outcome. Two candidates accused of corruption, Benyamin Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman, led their parties to greater success than in the election of 2006. The candidate claiming to be free of corruption, Tzipi Livni, led her party to the most seats in Knesset, but not enough to overcome Netanyahu's advantage of allies. Complicating the analysis of corruption and the election outcome is the fuzziness in the key concept. Corruption means different things to different communities and individuals. Israel is not free of corruption, but neither is it clearly more corrupt than other western democracies. Citizens may be inured to a chronic, but tolerable level of corruption, so that they do not consider it essential to guiding their votes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-178
Number of pages14
JournalIsrael Affairs
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Corruption
  • Election
  • Israel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corruption again, and again not decisive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this