Cost–Benefit analysis of class actions: An Israeli perspective

Alon Klement, Keren Weinshall-Margel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


We propose an analytical framework for evaluating the effectiveness of class actions, in which their costs are estimated against the benefits they produce in attaining three objectives: law enforcement and deterrence; access to courts; and compensation. We outline parameters for measuring the social costs and benefits relevant to these objectives and evaluate them for Israeli class actions, based on original data including all class actions filed between 2006 and 2012 (n =2, 056). Findings indicate that class actions did not substantially facilitate access to courts and compensation, and that they had limited success in realizing law enforcement and deterrence.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)75-103
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Mohr Siebeck.


Dive into the research topics of 'Cost–Benefit analysis of class actions: An Israeli perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this