Abstract
A mock-theft experiment was designed to assess the efficiency of two covert respiration measures in detection of concealed information. The covert measures were further compared with three standard measures typically used for the detection of concealed knowledge (electrodermal, respiration and finger pulse measures). Results revealed that the covert respiration measures produced good discrimination between "guilty" (participants possessing concealed knowledge) and "innocent" participants. One of the covert measures produced detection efficiency that was similar to that of the standard respiration and finger pulse measures, but less than the electrodermal measure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 284-291 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Biological Psychology |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2008 |
Keywords
- Concealed information test
- Detection of deception
- Polygraph
- Unobtrusive measurement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Covert respiration measures for the detection of concealed information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver