TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-boundary collaboration
T2 - Key to the conservation puzzle
AU - Kark, Salit
AU - Tulloch, Ayesha
AU - Gordon, Ascelin
AU - Mazor, Tessa
AU - Bunnefeld, Nils
AU - Levin, Noam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Conservation science is advancing rapidly, yet the majority of research overlooks a key factor that can play a major role in shaping the outcomes of conservation initiatives: collaboration. Here, we review the importance, benefits and limitations of incorporating collaboration into conservation and specifically into systematic conservation planning, providing a general framework for considering collaboration in conservation planning. Recent work shows that cross-boundary collaboration can have both positive and negative impacts on the outcomes of conservation and management efforts for protected areas, ecosystems, threatened and invasive species. The feasibility of collaboration, its likely effects and associated trade-offs should therefore be explicitly incorporated into conservation science and planning. This will ensure that conservation decisions avoid wasted funding when collaboration is infeasible, promoting collaboration when the benefits outweigh the costs.
AB - Conservation science is advancing rapidly, yet the majority of research overlooks a key factor that can play a major role in shaping the outcomes of conservation initiatives: collaboration. Here, we review the importance, benefits and limitations of incorporating collaboration into conservation and specifically into systematic conservation planning, providing a general framework for considering collaboration in conservation planning. Recent work shows that cross-boundary collaboration can have both positive and negative impacts on the outcomes of conservation and management efforts for protected areas, ecosystems, threatened and invasive species. The feasibility of collaboration, its likely effects and associated trade-offs should therefore be explicitly incorporated into conservation science and planning. This will ensure that conservation decisions avoid wasted funding when collaboration is infeasible, promoting collaboration when the benefits outweigh the costs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907709977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:84907709977
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 12
SP - 12
EP - 24
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -