TY - JOUR
T1 - Deductive nonmonotonic inference operations
T2 - Antitonic representations
AU - Kaluzhny, Yuri
AU - Lehmann, Daniel
PY - 1995/2
Y1 - 1995/2
N2 - We provide a characterization of those nonmonotonic inference operations C for which C(X) may be described as the set of all logical consequences of X together with some set of additional assumptions S(X) that depends anti-monotonically on X (i.e. X ⊆ Y implies S(Y) ⊆ S(X)). The operations represented are exactly characterized in terms of properties most of which have been studied by Freund and Lehmann. Similar characterizations of right-absorbing and cumulative operations are also provided. For cumulative operations, our results fit in closely with those of Freund. We then discuss extending finitary operations to infinitary operations in a canonical way and discuss co-compactness properties. Our results provide a satisfactory notion of pseudo-compactness, generalizing to deductive nonmonotonic operations the notion of compactness for monotonic operations. They also provide an alternative, more elegant and more general, proof of the existence of an infinitary deductive extension for any finitary deductive operation.
AB - We provide a characterization of those nonmonotonic inference operations C for which C(X) may be described as the set of all logical consequences of X together with some set of additional assumptions S(X) that depends anti-monotonically on X (i.e. X ⊆ Y implies S(Y) ⊆ S(X)). The operations represented are exactly characterized in terms of properties most of which have been studied by Freund and Lehmann. Similar characterizations of right-absorbing and cumulative operations are also provided. For cumulative operations, our results fit in closely with those of Freund. We then discuss extending finitary operations to infinitary operations in a canonical way and discuss co-compactness properties. Our results provide a satisfactory notion of pseudo-compactness, generalizing to deductive nonmonotonic operations the notion of compactness for monotonic operations. They also provide an alternative, more elegant and more general, proof of the existence of an infinitary deductive extension for any finitary deductive operation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642543788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/logcom/5.1.111
DO - 10.1093/logcom/5.1.111
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:1642543788
SN - 0955-792X
VL - 5
SP - 111
EP - 122
JO - Journal of Logic and Computation
JF - Journal of Logic and Computation
IS - 1
ER -