Defeat in Interstate War and the Probability of Political Liberalization

Shlomo O. Goldman*, Gadi Heimann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The study examines whether defeat in war increases the probability that states will be involved in an international crisis (as a diversionary policy), enter a process of political liberalization, or alternatively, curtail political rights. More generally, it examines the impact of the leaders’ weakness on their tendency to adopt these different strategies in order to overcome internal unrest. We look at defeat in war as an indicator of the leader’s weakness since we can assume a strong correlation exists between the two. The results showed a significant positive connection to political rights liberalization, indicating that defeat in war increases the probability of liberalization in political rights but does not significantly increase the probability of de-liberalization and diversionary policies. Therefore, the study strengthens the claim that a leader’s weakness tends to push him or her toward initiating political reforms.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)175-189
Number of pages15
JournalAlternatives
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords

  • de-liberalization
  • defeat
  • diversion
  • liberalization
  • war

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defeat in Interstate War and the Probability of Political Liberalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this