Defending Why Law Matters: Responses to Commentaries

Alon Harel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

WhyLawMatters examines various legal and political institutions and procedures and argues that the desirability of these institutions and procedures is not contingent and does not hinge (only) on the prospects that these institutions are conducive to the realization of valuable ends. Instead, various legal institutions and legal procedures that are often perceived as contingent means to facilitate the realization of valuable ends matter assuch.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)847-859
Number of pages13
JournalCriminal Law and Philosophy
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Keywords

  • Constitutional theory
  • Criminal law
  • Emergencies
  • Judicial review
  • Privatization
  • Public officials
  • Punishment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defending Why Law Matters: Responses to Commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this