Defending Why Law Matters: Responses to Commentaries

Alon Harel

doi:10.1007/s11572-016-9402-9

Defending Why Law Matters: Responses to Commentaries

Alon Harel^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

WhyLawMatters examines various legal and political institutions and procedures and argues that the desirability of these institutions and procedures is not contingent and does not hinge (only) on the prospects that these institutions are conducive to the realization of valuable ends. Instead, various legal institutions and legal procedures that are often perceived as contingent means to facilitate the realization of valuable ends matter assuch.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	847-859
Number of pages	13
Journal	Criminal Law and Philosophy
Volume	11
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-016-9402-9
State	Published - 1 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Keywords

Constitutional theory
Criminal law
Emergencies
Judicial review
Privatization
Public officials
Punishment

Access to Document

10.1007/s11572-016-9402-9

Cite this

@article{0ce866ead5e6408e9f31594015eae6d7,

title = "Defending Why Law Matters: Responses to Commentaries",

abstract = "WhyLawMatters examines various legal and political institutions and procedures and argues that the desirability of these institutions and procedures is not contingent and does not hinge (only) on the prospects that these institutions are conducive to the realization of valuable ends. Instead, various legal institutions and legal procedures that are often perceived as contingent means to facilitate the realization of valuable ends matter assuch.",

keywords = "Constitutional theory, Criminal law, Emergencies, Judicial review, Privatization, Public officials, Punishment",

author = "Alon Harel",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11572-016-9402-9",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "11",

pages = "847--859",

journal = "Criminal Law and Philosophy",

issn = "1871-9791",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defending Why Law Matters

T2 - Responses to Commentaries

AU - Harel, Alon

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - WhyLawMatters examines various legal and political institutions and procedures and argues that the desirability of these institutions and procedures is not contingent and does not hinge (only) on the prospects that these institutions are conducive to the realization of valuable ends. Instead, various legal institutions and legal procedures that are often perceived as contingent means to facilitate the realization of valuable ends matter assuch.

AB - WhyLawMatters examines various legal and political institutions and procedures and argues that the desirability of these institutions and procedures is not contingent and does not hinge (only) on the prospects that these institutions are conducive to the realization of valuable ends. Instead, various legal institutions and legal procedures that are often perceived as contingent means to facilitate the realization of valuable ends matter assuch.

KW - Constitutional theory

KW - Criminal law

KW - Emergencies

KW - Judicial review

KW - Privatization

KW - Public officials

KW - Punishment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979656520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11572-016-9402-9

DO - 10.1007/s11572-016-9402-9

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:84979656520

SN - 1871-9791

VL - 11

SP - 847

EP - 859

JO - Criminal Law and Philosophy

JF - Criminal Law and Philosophy

IS - 4

ER -

Defending Why Law Matters: Responses to Commentaries

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this