Abstract
Conduct preparatory to the commission of a crime typically comprises acts like gathering vital information, making initial contact with the prospective victim, reconnoitering the site of the crime, obtaining materials and tools, and gaining expertise knowledge. Many Western penal codes categorically distinguish preparatory actions from an attempt in attending to cases whereby an actor engages in conduct planned to culminate in the commission of an offence.1 In Canada2 and the United Kingdom,3 as well as in Germany,4 France,5 and Spain,6 liability for an attempt may only attach for actions beyond preparation. Hence, preparatory conduct can only trigger criminal liability if prohibited as a specific offence.7 In contrast, the notion of an attempt in the penal codes of many American states8 as well asItaly9 extends further and encompasses conspicuous acts of preparation which clearly manifest the actor's criminal intention. In this article, reference to an attempt will be confined to the so-called "objectivist"10 version involving conduct beyond preparation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-142 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Desert and punishment for acts preparatory to the commission of a crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver