Determinants of phonetic word duration in ten language documentation corpora: Word frequency, complexity, position, and part of speech

Jan Strunk, Frank Seifart*, Swintha Danielsen, Iren Hartmann, Brigitte Pakendorf, Søren Wichmann, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Balthasar Bickel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper explores the application of quantitative methods to study the effect of various factors on phonetic word duration in ten languages. Data on most of these languages were collected in fieldwork aiming at documenting spontaneous speech in mostly endangered languages, to be used for multiple purposes, including the preservation of cultural heritage and community work. Here we show the feasibility of studying processes of online acceleration and deceleration of speech across languages using such data, which have not been considered for this purpose before. Our results show that it is possible to detect a consistent effect of higher frequency of words leading to faster articulation even in the relatively small language documentation corpora used here. We also show that nouns tend to be pronounced more slowly than verbs when controlling for other factors. Comparison of the effects of these and other factors shows that some of them are difficult to capture with the current data and methods, including potential effects of crosslinguistic differences in morphological complexity. In general, this paper argues for widening the cross-linguistic scope of phonetic and psycholinguistic research by including the wealth of language documentation data that has recently become available.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)423-461
Number of pages39
JournalLanguage Documentation and Conservation
Volume14
StatePublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of phonetic word duration in ten language documentation corpora: Word frequency, complexity, position, and part of speech'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this