Abstract
Against the theory of third-party moral hazard—focusing on third parties who decline their risk-reducing effort in light of insurance—I analyze the mirror-image phenomenon of third-party deterrence: cases in which third parties engage in activities designed to counterbalance the insured’s moral hazard. I characterize the settings in which third-party deterrence replaces third-party moral hazard; address the economic foundations of this problem; and study its effects on risk transferring within the triangle of insurer, insured, and third parties. I also point to additional frameworks that may give rise to third-party deterrence, discuss possible implications for the incentives of insurers, and identify countervailing forces that may alleviate the ascribed distortion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 239-255 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Legal Studies |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deterrence by Insurance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver