Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development process of a praxeology for supporting the teaching of proofs in a CAS environment based on teachers' experience in a professional development course

  • Nurit Zehavi*
  • , Giora Mann
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents the development process of a praxeology (theory-of-practice) for supporting the teaching of proofs in a CAS environment. The characteristics of the praxeology were elaborated within the frame of a professional development course for teaching analytic geometry with CAS. The theoretical framework draws on Cheval-lard's anthropological approach to the didactics of mathematics and Duval's analysis of transformations within and between registers of semiotic representations. The teachers (n = 43) were asked (a) to draw conjectures regarding unfamiliar behavior of tangents to hyperbola, before and after exploration using given slider bars; and (b) to prove their conjectures after being exposed to the algebraic expressions underlying the slider bars. The teachers were also asked twice, before and after (b), to rate the need to ask students for an algebraic proof in similar tasks. Three types of proofs are presented in an increasing order of the level of mathematical maturity exhibited in each proof. Based on results coming from the empirical study, we propose a praxeology for preparing teachers to teach proofs consisting of Task design, Techniques, and Didactical discourse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-181
Number of pages29
JournalTechnology, Knowledge and Learning
Volume16 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Analytic geometry
  • Computer algebra systems
  • Praxeology
  • Proof
  • Semiotic representations
  • Slider bars

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development process of a praxeology for supporting the teaching of proofs in a CAS environment based on teachers' experience in a professional development course'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this