TY - JOUR
T1 - Developmental assessment of preterm infants
T2 - Chronological or corrected age?
AU - Harel-Gadassi, Ayelet
AU - Friedlander, Edwa
AU - Yaari, Maya
AU - Bar-Oz, Benjamin
AU - Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
AU - Mankuta, David
AU - Yirmiya, Nurit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - The aim of this study is to examine the effect of age correction on the developmental assessment scores of preterm infants, using for the first time, the Mullen scales of early learning (MSEL) test. Participants included 110 preterm infants (born at a gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks) at ages 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. The corrected age-based MSEL composite score and each of the five MSEL scale scores were significantly higher than chronological age-based scores at all ages. These corrected scores were significantly higher than the chronological scores regardless of gestational age whether weight was, or adequate or small for gestational age. Larger differences between corrected and chronological age-based scores significantly correlated with earlier gestational age and with lower birth weight between 1 and 24 months but not at 36 months. Using chronological age-based scores yielded significantly more infants identified with developmental delays than using corrected age-based scores. The findings indicate that clinicians and researchers, as well as family members, should be aware of and acknowledge the distinction between corrected and chronological ages when evaluating preterm infants in research and clinical practices.
AB - The aim of this study is to examine the effect of age correction on the developmental assessment scores of preterm infants, using for the first time, the Mullen scales of early learning (MSEL) test. Participants included 110 preterm infants (born at a gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks) at ages 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. The corrected age-based MSEL composite score and each of the five MSEL scale scores were significantly higher than chronological age-based scores at all ages. These corrected scores were significantly higher than the chronological scores regardless of gestational age whether weight was, or adequate or small for gestational age. Larger differences between corrected and chronological age-based scores significantly correlated with earlier gestational age and with lower birth weight between 1 and 24 months but not at 36 months. Using chronological age-based scores yielded significantly more infants identified with developmental delays than using corrected age-based scores. The findings indicate that clinicians and researchers, as well as family members, should be aware of and acknowledge the distinction between corrected and chronological ages when evaluating preterm infants in research and clinical practices.
KW - Chronological age
KW - Cognitive development
KW - Corrected age
KW - Mullen scales of early learning
KW - Preterm infants
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048331560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.06.002
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29906778
AN - SCOPUS:85048331560
SN - 0891-4222
VL - 80
SP - 35
EP - 43
JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities
JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities
ER -