Deviance in science: Towards the criminology of science

Nachman Ben-yehuda*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents and analyses various cases of deviance in science. The paper also examines those aspects of the structure and process of "doing science" which are conducive to deviance. The major conclusion is that deviance in science is badly represented by the old "bad apples" theory and that the "iceberg theory" probably describes this phenomenon more accurately, thus calling for a new criminology of science. The analysis details types of deviance in science, its scope and compares it to other forms of deviance. It is argued that Matza's control theory should be used to understand and interpret the puzzle of deviance in science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1986

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deviance in science: Towards the criminology of science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this