Dialectical dialogue: The struggle for speech, repressive silence, and the shift to multiplicity

Zali Gurevitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the present essay I intend to explore 'dialectical dialogue' in three distinct moments: the battle for recognition, the ethics of giving recognition, and the multiplicity of conversation. The essay begins with Hegel's figures of Master and Slave portraying the struggle of speech for recognition. This struggle culminates in a duel for mastery, which implies the repression and silencing of the other's speech. Ethical dialogue comes as a response to repressive silence, calling the other into egalitarian exchange. Ethical dialogue as such, however, remains within the dialectical framework of agonistic relations. To shift from dialectics to multiplicity, the essay turns from the politics of recognition to the poetics of conversation, to polyphony and to passage. I will follow the three moments both separately, through particular dialogic instances and theoretical perspectives, and as they develop, respond to, and shift from one to the other. Together they will portray an idea of the 'social' as a critical dialogic stance with its inherent dialectical betweenness and potential opening and expanding multiplicity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-104
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2001

Keywords

  • Dialectics
  • Dialogue
  • Ethics
  • Multiplicity
  • Silence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dialectical dialogue: The struggle for speech, repressive silence, and the shift to multiplicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this