Difficulty to Reach Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys

Ori Heffetz, Daniel B Reeves

Research output: Working paper/preprintWorking paper

Abstract

How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX)—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCambridge, Mass
PublisherNational Bureau of Economic Research
Number of pages43
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Publication series

NameNBER working paper series
PublisherNational Bureau of Economic Research
Volumeno. w22333

Bibliographical note

June 2016.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Difficulty to Reach Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this