Abstract
How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX)—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Cambridge, Mass |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
| Number of pages | 43 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | NBER working paper series |
|---|---|
| Publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
| Volume | no. w22333 |
Bibliographical note
June 2016.UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Difficulty to Reach Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver