TY - JOUR
T1 - Diffusivity in breast malignancies analyzed for b > 1000 s/mm2 at 1 mm in-plane resolutions
T2 - Insight from Gaussian and non-Gaussian behaviors
AU - Otikovs, Martins
AU - Nissan, Noam
AU - Furman-Haran, Edna
AU - Anaby, Debbie
AU - Allweis, Tanir M.
AU - Agassi, Ravit
AU - Sklair-Levy, Miri
AU - Frydman, Lucio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can improve breast cancer characterizations, but often suffers from low image quality –particularly at informative b > 1000 s/mm2 values. The aim of this study was to evaluate multishot approaches characterizing Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusivities in breast cancer. This was a prospective study, in which 15 subjects, including 13 patients with biopsy-confirmed breast cancers, were enrolled. DWI was acquired at 3 T using echo planar imaging (EPI) with and without zoomed excitations, readout-segmented EPI (RESOLVE), and spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN); dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) data were collected using three-dimensional gradient-echo T1 weighting; anatomies were evaluated with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo. Congruence between malignancies delineated by DCE was assessed against high-resolution DWI scans with b-values in the 0–1800 s/mm2 range, as well as against apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and kurtosis maps. Data were evaluated by independent magnetic resonance scientists with 3–20 years of experience, and radiologists with 6 and 20 years of experience in breast MRI. Malignancies were assessed from ADC and kurtosis maps, using paired t tests after confirming that these values had a Gaussian distribution. Agreements between DWI and DCE datasets were also evaluated using Sorensen–Dice similarity coefficients. Cancerous and normal tissues were clearly separable by ADCs: by SPEN their average values were (1.03 ± 0.17) × 10−3 and (1.69 ± 0.19) × 10−3 mm2/s (p < 0.0001); by RESOLVE these values were (1.16 ± 0.16) × 10−3 and (1.52 ± 0.14) × 10−3 (p = 0.00026). Kurtosis also distinguished lesions (K = 0.64 ± 0.15) from normal tissues (K = 0.45 ± 0.05), but only when measured by SPEN (p = 0.0008). The best statistical agreement with DCE-highlighted regions arose for SPEN-based DWIs recorded with b = 1800 s/mm2 (Sorensen–Dice coefficient = 0.67); DWI data recorded with b = 850 and 1200 s/mm2, led to lower coefficients. Both ADC and kurtosis maps highlighted the breast malignancies, with ADCs providing a more significant separation. The most promising alternative for contrast-free delineations of the cancerous lesions arose from b = 1800 s/mm2 DWI. Level of Evidence: 2. Technical Efficacy Stage: 3.
AB - Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can improve breast cancer characterizations, but often suffers from low image quality –particularly at informative b > 1000 s/mm2 values. The aim of this study was to evaluate multishot approaches characterizing Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusivities in breast cancer. This was a prospective study, in which 15 subjects, including 13 patients with biopsy-confirmed breast cancers, were enrolled. DWI was acquired at 3 T using echo planar imaging (EPI) with and without zoomed excitations, readout-segmented EPI (RESOLVE), and spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN); dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) data were collected using three-dimensional gradient-echo T1 weighting; anatomies were evaluated with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo. Congruence between malignancies delineated by DCE was assessed against high-resolution DWI scans with b-values in the 0–1800 s/mm2 range, as well as against apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and kurtosis maps. Data were evaluated by independent magnetic resonance scientists with 3–20 years of experience, and radiologists with 6 and 20 years of experience in breast MRI. Malignancies were assessed from ADC and kurtosis maps, using paired t tests after confirming that these values had a Gaussian distribution. Agreements between DWI and DCE datasets were also evaluated using Sorensen–Dice similarity coefficients. Cancerous and normal tissues were clearly separable by ADCs: by SPEN their average values were (1.03 ± 0.17) × 10−3 and (1.69 ± 0.19) × 10−3 mm2/s (p < 0.0001); by RESOLVE these values were (1.16 ± 0.16) × 10−3 and (1.52 ± 0.14) × 10−3 (p = 0.00026). Kurtosis also distinguished lesions (K = 0.64 ± 0.15) from normal tissues (K = 0.45 ± 0.05), but only when measured by SPEN (p = 0.0008). The best statistical agreement with DCE-highlighted regions arose for SPEN-based DWIs recorded with b = 1800 s/mm2 (Sorensen–Dice coefficient = 0.67); DWI data recorded with b = 850 and 1200 s/mm2, led to lower coefficients. Both ADC and kurtosis maps highlighted the breast malignancies, with ADCs providing a more significant separation. The most promising alternative for contrast-free delineations of the cancerous lesions arose from b = 1800 s/mm2 DWI. Level of Evidence: 2. Technical Efficacy Stage: 3.
KW - breast cancer diagnosis
KW - diffusion kurtosis imaging
KW - diffusion-weighted imaging
KW - spatiotemporal encoding
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098079498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.27489
DO - 10.1002/jmri.27489
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33368734
AN - SCOPUS:85098079498
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 53
SP - 1913
EP - 1925
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 6
ER -