TY - JOUR
T1 - Dimensional regulation of cell-cycle events in Escherichia coli during steady-state growth
AU - Grover, N. B.
AU - Woldringh, C. L.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Two opposing models have been put forward in the literature to describe the changes in the shape of individual Escherichia coli cells in steady-state growth that take place during the cell cycle: the Length model, which maintains that the regulating dimension is cell length, and the Volume model, which asserts it to be cell volume. In addition, the former model envisages cell diameter as decreasing with length up to constriction whereas the latter sees it as being constrained by the rigid cell wall. These two models differ in the correlations they predict between the various cellular dimensions (diameter, length, volume) not only across the entire population of bacteria but also, and especially, within subpopulations that define specific cell-cycle events (division, for example, or onset of constriction); the coefficients of variation at these specific events are also expected to be very different. Observations from cells prepared for electron microscopy (air-dried) and for phase-contrast microscopy (hydrated) appeared qualitatively largely in accordance with the predictions of the Length model. To obtain a more quantitative comparison, simulations were carried out of populations defined by each of the models; again, the results favoured the Length model. Finally, in age-selected cells using membrane elution, the diameter-length and diameter-volume correlations were in complete agreement with the Length model, as were the coefficient of variation. It is concluded that, at least with respect to cell-cycle events such as onset of constriction and cell division, length rather than volume is the controlling dimension.
AB - Two opposing models have been put forward in the literature to describe the changes in the shape of individual Escherichia coli cells in steady-state growth that take place during the cell cycle: the Length model, which maintains that the regulating dimension is cell length, and the Volume model, which asserts it to be cell volume. In addition, the former model envisages cell diameter as decreasing with length up to constriction whereas the latter sees it as being constrained by the rigid cell wall. These two models differ in the correlations they predict between the various cellular dimensions (diameter, length, volume) not only across the entire population of bacteria but also, and especially, within subpopulations that define specific cell-cycle events (division, for example, or onset of constriction); the coefficients of variation at these specific events are also expected to be very different. Observations from cells prepared for electron microscopy (air-dried) and for phase-contrast microscopy (hydrated) appeared qualitatively largely in accordance with the predictions of the Length model. To obtain a more quantitative comparison, simulations were carried out of populations defined by each of the models; again, the results favoured the Length model. Finally, in age-selected cells using membrane elution, the diameter-length and diameter-volume correlations were in complete agreement with the Length model, as were the coefficient of variation. It is concluded that, at least with respect to cell-cycle events such as onset of constriction and cell division, length rather than volume is the controlling dimension.
KW - Cell shape during growth cycle
KW - Correlation between cell dimensions
KW - Diameter changes with cell age
KW - Length versus volume regulation
KW - Models of individual cell growth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035148554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1099/00221287-147-1-171
DO - 10.1099/00221287-147-1-171
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 11160811
AN - SCOPUS:0035148554
SN - 1350-0872
VL - 147
SP - 171
EP - 181
JO - Microbiology
JF - Microbiology
IS - 1
ER -