Discrimination of DNA Polymerase and RNase H Activities in Reverse Transcriptase of Avian Myeloblastosis Virus

Marian Gorecki*, Amos Panet

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The active sites in reverse transcriptase of avian myeloblastosis virus have been selectively modified by various chemical reagents. The DNA polymerase activity is very sensitive to hydrophobic sulfhydryl reagents such as 5,5ʹ-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) and p-hydroxymercuribenzoate but resistant to sulfhydryl reagents with hydrophilic properties. The RNase H activity, on the other hand, is resistant to both hydrophobic and hydrophilic sulfhydryl reagents, indicating the absence of cysteinyl residues essential for RNase H activity. N-Ethylmaleimide (NEM), an amino and sulfhydryl group specific reagent, inactivates both DNA polymerase and RNase H, the later activity being fourfold more stable. Polynucleotides, but not nucleotide triphosphates, protect the two enzymatic activities of reverse transcriptase against NEM. Since pretreatment of the enzyme with 5,5ʹ-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) does not prevent N-ethylmaleimide from reacting with a residue necessary for DNA polymerase activity, two different reactive groups are probably involved with this enzymatic activity. The pH profile of reverse transcriptase inhibition by N-ethylmaleimide also suggests the involvement of two reactive groups essential for the DNA polymerase activity with apparent pKas of 5.5 and 6.5. Only one reactive group with a pKa of 7.5 is found associated with the RNase H activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2438-2442
Number of pages5
JournalBiochemistry
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1978

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discrimination of DNA Polymerase and RNase H Activities in Reverse Transcriptase of Avian Myeloblastosis Virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this