Dismantling the master’s house using the master’s tools 1: On the sociology of organizational knowledge

Tammar B. Zilber, John M. Amis, Johanna Mair

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

2 Scopus citations


In this introduction, the authors outline some critical reflections on the sociology of knowledge within management and organization theory. Based on a review of various works that form a sociology of organizational knowledge, the authors identify three approaches that have become particularly prominent ways by which scholars explore how knowledge about organizations and management is produced: First, reflective and opinion essays that organization studies scholars offer on the basis of what can be learned from personal experience; second, descriptive craft-guides that are based on more-or-less comprehensive surveys on doing research; third, papers based on systematic research that are built upon rigorous collection and analysis of data about the production of knowledge. Whereas in the studies of organizing the authors prioritize the third approach, that is knowledge produced based on systematic empirical research, in examining our own work the authors tend to privilege the other two types, reflective articles and surveys. In what follows the authors highlight this gap, offer some explanations thereof, and call for a better appreciation of all three ways to offer rich understandings of organizations, work and management as well as a fruitful sociology of knowledge in our field.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Number of pages19
StatePublished - 2019

Publication series

NameResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
ISSN (Print)0733-558X

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by Emerald Publishing Limited.


Dive into the research topics of 'Dismantling the master’s house using the master’s tools 1: On the sociology of organizational knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this