Disrupted gene pattern in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure

Moriah Koler, Hanna Achache, Avi Tsafrir, Yoav Smith, Ariel Revel*, Reuven Reich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

128 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUNDRepeated implantation failure (RIF) is a severe obstacle in human assisted reproduction treatment.METHODSAiming to identify global gene profile in RIF patients, gene-array analyses were performed on endometrial samples collected on day 21 of the cycle from fertile women (n = 12) and from RIF patients (n = 20). Validation of cyclin E2, Slug, dickkopf homolog 1 (DKK1), lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) and secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) was carried out by real-time PCR.RESULTSGene-array analysis revealed 313 genes exhibiting modified expression levels in RIF patients. Of these, 288 genes (92) were down-regulated and only 25 genes (8) were up-regulated. Classification of the down-regulated genes to biological pathways revealed cell cycle, Wnt signaling and cellular adhesion pathways. Real-time PCR validation of cyclin E2, SFRP1 and LEF1 showed significantly lower expression levels in RIF-IVF patients as compared with fertile women. In addition, two up-regulated genes, Slug and DKK1, were also validated. Interestingly, about 8 of the down-regulated genes were estrogen-dependent. Western blot of estrogen receptor α revealed low expression of this protein in the RIF group.CONCLUSIONSThe evaluation of the endometrium of RIF patients by gene array analysis demonstrates that the expression of various genes is altered, including those belonging to the cell cycle, Wnt signaling and cellular adhesion pathways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2541-2548
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Keywords

  • Female infertility
  • Gene-array
  • Implantation
  • Implantation-array

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disrupted gene pattern in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this