Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging?

  • Aharon Finestone
  • , Tuvia Schlesinger
  • , Hagay Amir
  • , Elihu Richter
  • , Charles Milgrom*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Proper use of medical imaging tools requires knowledge of their associated radiation risks, as well as their possible benefits. The authors assessed physicians' knowledge of the radiation risks associated with bone scintigraphy (bone scan) during an annual meeting of the Israeli Orthopedic Society. The mortality risk of radiation-induced carcinoma from bone scan was identified correctly by less than 5% of respondents. The most frequent answer (38.4%) was the option that was least correct. Senior orthopedists estimated lower risks than did residents. Overall, respondents grossly underestimated the potential radiation risk from bone scan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-62
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Environmental Health
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bone scan
  • Cancer risk
  • Medical imaging
  • Radiation
  • Scintigraphy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this