Abstract
The transgenerational community is based on moral similarity between contemporary and future people, referring to an ongoing moral deliberation across generations. It justifies obligations of justice towards the not yet born. Prioritarianism gives extra weight to the wellbeing of the least advantaged. I argue that both sentiments are egalitarian, and ask whether there is any tension between them. If we assume economic growth, and/or technological improvements and/or inflation, then prioritarianism prima facie implies that we should prefer to spend any dollar on today's disadvantaged than on future generations, hence is in tension with the demands of the transgenerational community. Analyzing four ways of meeting this challenge, I argue that the two principles are not in tension.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 105-118 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Monist |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s),. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do the Current Poor Owe Anything to Future Persons? the Transgenerational Community Principle and Prioritarianism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver