Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to?

Dotan R. Castro*, Avraham N. Kluger, Guy Itzchakov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

We tested both Rogers's hypothesis that listening enables speakers to experience psychological safety and our hypothesis that the benefit of listening for psychological safety is attenuated by avoidance-attachment style. We tested these hypotheses in six laboratory experiments, a field correlational study, and a scenario experiment. We meta-analyzed the results of the laboratory experiments and found that listening increased psychological safety on average but that the variance between the experiments was also significant. The between experiment variance in the effect of listening manipulation on psychological safety exposes a methodological challenge in choosing a research paradigm of good-versus-normal listening, as opposed to normal-versus-poor listening. More importantly, we found, as expected and across all designs, that the higher the avoidance-attachment style was, the lower the effect of listening on psychological safety. This finding has implications both for practice and for placing a theoretical boundary on Rogers's theory.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)762-775
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

  • Carl Rogers
  • avoidance-attachment style
  • listening
  • psychological safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this