Does individual advocacy work? A research and evaluation protocol for a youth anti-sex trafficking program

Keyphrases

• Evaluation Protocol 100%
• Sex Trafficking 100%
• Advocacy Work 100%
• Texas 66%
• Public Healthcare 66%
• Public Social Services 66%
• Advocacy Program 66%
• Ethics 33%
• United States 33%
• Scientific Community 33%
• Vulnerable Youth 33%
• At-risk 33%
• Chi-square 33%
• Public Health 33%
• Multidisciplinary Team 33%
• Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) 33%
• Public Attention 33%
• Peer-reviewed Journals 33%
• Institutional Review Board 33%
• Multivariate Logistic Regression 33%
• Paired T-test 33%
• Assessment Treatment 33%
• Change Assessment 33%
• Multiple Linear Regression 33%
• Standardized Survey 33%
• Descriptive Statistics 33%
• Coping Self-efficacy 33%
• Needs Assessment 33%
• Revictimization 33%
• Referral Service 33%
• Latent Profile Analysis 33%
• Self-efficacy Scale 33%
• Psychosocial Stress 33%
• Crisis Response 33%
• Cisgender 33%
• Rhode Island 33%
• Case Management Services 33%
• Mentoring Services 33%
• Anti-trafficking 33%
• Rapid Deployment 33%
• Hybrid Communities 33%
• Personalized Treatment Plans 33%
• Poisson Regression Profile 33%

Social Sciences

• Sex Trafficking 100%
• Social Services 66%
• Texas 66%
• Case Management 66%
• Public Health Service 66%
• USA 33%
• Self-Efficacy 33%
• Descriptive Statistics 33%
• Needs Assessment 33%
• Perceived Social Support 33%
• Underage 33%
• Crisis Response 33%
• Cisgender 33%
• Profile Analysis 33%