Does land reform matter? Some experiences from the former Soviet Union

Zvi Lerman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is still no evidence that new farming structures created in the process of land reform have achieved higher productivity than traditional farms. The most striking achievements of reform include a sharp reduction in state ownership of land and a substantial increase in the share of individual farming relative to collective agriculture. Among the rural population, independent private farmers appear to be more optimistic and economically better off than members of collective farm enterprises. This provides qualitative evidence of a positive impact of reform, as private farmers are direct participants in the process of reform, while rural residents who choose to remain in collectives largely shirk exposure to reform and continue to work within a traditional framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-330
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Keywords

  • Collective farms
  • Economies in transition
  • Farm restructuring
  • Land reform
  • Private farmers
  • Rural development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does land reform matter? Some experiences from the former Soviet Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this