Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two-tier system design, and conscientious fact-finding

David Enoch; Talia Fisher; Levi Spectre

doi:10.1111/phis.12203

Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two-tier system design, and conscientious fact-finding

David Enoch^*, Talia Fisher, Levi Spectre

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	85-103
Number of pages	19
Journal	Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues
Volume	31
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12203
State	Published - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
For comments on earlier versions we thank Matt Kotzen and Sarah Moss. Earlier versions of this paper were given as talks at the Social (Distance) Epistemology Virtual Event Series, in June 2020, and at the “Emerging Trends in Criminal Justice: Writers' Workshop” at Osgoode Hall Law School. We thank the participants of both occasions.

Access to Document

10.1111/phis.12203

Cite this

@article{bcd7ab6595f9496cabcfe2eed2fbef14,

title = "Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two-tier system design, and conscientious fact-finding",

author = "David Enoch and Talia Fisher and Levi Spectre",

note = "Funding Information: For comments on earlier versions we thank Matt Kotzen and Sarah Moss. Earlier versions of this paper were given as talks at the Social (Distance) Epistemology Virtual Event Series, in June 2020, and at the “Emerging Trends in Criminal Justice: Writers' Workshop” at Osgoode Hall Law School. We thank the participants of both occasions.",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1111/phis.12203",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "31",

pages = "85--103",

journal = "Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues",

issn = "1533-6077",

publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two-tier system design, and conscientious fact-finding

AU - Enoch, David

AU - Fisher, Talia

AU - Spectre, Levi

N1 - Funding Information: For comments on earlier versions we thank Matt Kotzen and Sarah Moss. Earlier versions of this paper were given as talks at the Social (Distance) Epistemology Virtual Event Series, in June 2020, and at the “Emerging Trends in Criminal Justice: Writers' Workshop” at Osgoode Hall Law School. We thank the participants of both occasions.

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116098154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/phis.12203

DO - 10.1111/phis.12203

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:85116098154

SN - 1533-6077

VL - 31

SP - 85

EP - 103

JO - Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues

JF - Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues

IS - 1

ER -

Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two-tier system design, and conscientious fact-finding

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this