Abstract
Impact evaluations of behavioral interventions typically focus on target outcomes. Might interventions induce negative spillovers on other behaviors? I run a large field experiment in which individuals receive combinations of messages and incentives promoting two healthy behaviors, meditation and meal logging. I find that the interventions reduce completion rates of the opposite behavior by 19–29 percent. I find that interventions with larger target effects do not necessarily generate larger negative spillovers, and demonstrate implications for cost-effectiveness analysis. I investigate the mechanisms behind the observed spillovers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 249-277 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | American Economic Journal: Applied Economics |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© (2024), (American Economic Association). All Rights Reserved.
Keywords
- C93
- D62
- D91
- I12