Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to cast doubt on the common allegation that quantum mechanics (QM) is incompatible with realism. I argue that the results usually considered inimical to realism, notably the violation of Bell's inequality, in fact play the opposite role - they support realism. The argument is not intended, however, to demonstrate realism or refute its alternatives as general metaphysical positions. It is directed specifically at the view that QM differs from classical mechanics in that, unlike classical mechanics, it is not amenable to a realist interpretation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-290 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1997 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dummett vs Bell on quantum mechanics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver