Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Educating for quality in the wood industry: Some words of caution

  • Sydney Engelberg*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The problem of over enthusiastically adopting paradigms and models is well known in science in general, and in management in particular. The current trend of presenting 'quality' in an unfailingly positive light in manufacturing, including in the wood industry, echoes this problem. This results in those aspects of 'quality enhancement' that reflect negative processes and emotions being neglected, receiving lip service attention, or in subtle ways being denigrated. This is, potentially, the source of a severe limitation in the understanding and implementation of quality enhancement programs in the wood industry. Good intentions are insufficient. We cannot continue to neglect such issues as: authority and control; caution and reserve; autonomy and separateness; competition and aggressiveness; dislike and resistance; exploitation and manipulation; and Self-Interest, if we wish education for quality to be successful.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-96
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Quality Research
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

  • Education
  • Quality in the wood industry
  • Wood working

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educating for quality in the wood industry: Some words of caution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this