TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of fall irrigation level in 'Mauritius' and 'Floridian' lychee on soil and plant water status, flowering intensity, and yield
AU - Stern, R. A.
AU - Meron, M.
AU - Naor, A.
AU - Wallach, R.
AU - Bravdo, B.
AU - Gazit, S.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - The effect of fall irrigation level in 'Mauritius' and 'Floridian' lychee (Litchi chinerisis Sonn.) on soil and plant water status, flowering intensity, and yield the following year was studied in a field during 2 consecutive years. At the end of the second vegetative flush after harvest (1 Oct. 1994 and 10 Oct. 1995), four irrigation treatments were initiated: 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0 Class A pan evaporation coefficients designated 100%, 50%, 25%, and 0%. The three lower irrigation levels effectively stopped shoot growth, suggesting the 50% treatment to be the threshold for shoot growth cessation in both years. For both years, flowering intensity and yield in the 100% treatment were lower than those following the other three treatments. Soil and plant water-stress indicators responded to the water-stress irrigation treatments. However soil water-potential values were highly variable relative to plant water potentials. Stem water potential differed more markedly between treatments than leaf water potential. Midday stem water potential appeared to be the best water-stress indicator for irrigation control. Midday stem water potential in both years was correlated with midday vapor-pressure deficit, suggesting that the threshold for irrigation control should take into account evaporative demand.
AB - The effect of fall irrigation level in 'Mauritius' and 'Floridian' lychee (Litchi chinerisis Sonn.) on soil and plant water status, flowering intensity, and yield the following year was studied in a field during 2 consecutive years. At the end of the second vegetative flush after harvest (1 Oct. 1994 and 10 Oct. 1995), four irrigation treatments were initiated: 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0 Class A pan evaporation coefficients designated 100%, 50%, 25%, and 0%. The three lower irrigation levels effectively stopped shoot growth, suggesting the 50% treatment to be the threshold for shoot growth cessation in both years. For both years, flowering intensity and yield in the 100% treatment were lower than those following the other three treatments. Soil and plant water-stress indicators responded to the water-stress irrigation treatments. However soil water-potential values were highly variable relative to plant water potentials. Stem water potential differed more markedly between treatments than leaf water potential. Midday stem water potential appeared to be the best water-stress indicator for irrigation control. Midday stem water potential in both years was correlated with midday vapor-pressure deficit, suggesting that the threshold for irrigation control should take into account evaporative demand.
KW - Leaf water potential
KW - Litchi chinensis
KW - Stem water potential
KW - Water stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031974919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21273/jashs.123.1.150
DO - 10.21273/jashs.123.1.150
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0031974919
SN - 0003-1062
VL - 123
SP - 150
EP - 155
JO - Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
JF - Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
IS - 1
ER -