Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy compared with bimanual therapy home programs for infants with hemiplegia: A randomized controlled trial

  • Rena Chamudot*
  • , Shula Parush
  • , Amihai Rigbi
  • , Roni Horovitz
  • , Varda Gross-Tsur
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We examined the effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) in treating infants with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and compared therapy outcomes with a nonconstraining bimanual therapy (BIM) of equal intensity. METHOD. In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 33 infants with hemiplegia (mean corrected age 5 11.1 mo, standard deviation 5 2.2) received either mCIMT (n 5 17) or BIM (n 5 16). Both interventions included home programs encouraging the use of the affected hand during daily 1-hr play sessions for 8 wk. Outcome measures were administered pre- and posttreatment and included the Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment for babies and the Functional Inventory. At baseline, parents also filled out the Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire. RESULTS. Both groups demonstrated a significantly large and equal improvement in hand and gross motor function posttreatment (p < .001) and high treatment compliance. CONCLUSION. mCIMT and BIM are equally effective methods for treating infants with hemiplegia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number025981
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy compared with bimanual therapy home programs for infants with hemiplegia: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this