TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of oral methotrexate in paediatric Crohn's disease
T2 - A multicentre propensity score study
AU - Turner, Dan
AU - Doveh, Etti
AU - Cohen, Ayala
AU - Wilson, Michelle L.
AU - Grossman, Andrew B.
AU - Rosh, Joel R.
AU - Lu, Ying
AU - Bousvaros, Athos
AU - Deslandres, Colette
AU - Noble, Angela
AU - Baldassano, Robert N.
AU - Levine, Arie
AU - Lerner, Aaron
AU - Wilson, David C.
AU - Griffiths, Anne M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Statistical analyses were funded from a personal research fund of DT. The Crohn''s disease cohort in SE Scotland was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) patient research cohorts initiative grant (G0800675) for PICTS to DCW, and the GI-Nutrition research fund, University of Edinburgh.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Background: Oral methotrexate (MTX) administration avoids weekly injections, reduces costs and may improve quality of life of patients with Crohn's disease (CD), especially children. Routes of administration have never been systematically compared in CD. We aimed to compare effectiveness and safety of orally (PO) versus subcutaneously (SC) administered MTX in paediatric CD. Methods: 226 children with CD treated with oral or subcutaneous MTX were included in a multicentre, retrospective 1-year cohort study (62% boys, mean age 13.8±2.8 years, 88% previous thiopurines). 38 (17%) were initially commenced on oral, 98 (43%) started subcutaneous and switched to oral and 90 (40%) were treated with subcutaneous only. Matching and 'doubly robust' weighted regression models were based on the propensity score method, controlling for confounding-byindication bias. 11/23 pretreatment variables were different between the groups, but the propensity score modelling successfully balanced the treatment groups. Results: 76 children (34%) had sustained steroid-free remission with a difference that did not reach significance between the PO and the SC groups (weighted OR=1.72 (95% CI 0.5 to 5.9); p=0.52). There were no differences in need for treatment escalation (p=0.24), elevated liver enzymes (p=0.59) or nausea (p=0.85). Height velocity was lower in the PO group (p=0.006) and time to remission was delayed in the PO group (p=0.036; Fleming (0, 1) test). Conclusions: In this largest paediatric CD cohort to date, SC administered MTX was superior to PO, but only in some of the outcomes and with a modest effect size. Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider switching Zchildren in complete remission treated with subcutaneous MTX to the oral route with close monitoring of inflammatory markers and growth.
AB - Background: Oral methotrexate (MTX) administration avoids weekly injections, reduces costs and may improve quality of life of patients with Crohn's disease (CD), especially children. Routes of administration have never been systematically compared in CD. We aimed to compare effectiveness and safety of orally (PO) versus subcutaneously (SC) administered MTX in paediatric CD. Methods: 226 children with CD treated with oral or subcutaneous MTX were included in a multicentre, retrospective 1-year cohort study (62% boys, mean age 13.8±2.8 years, 88% previous thiopurines). 38 (17%) were initially commenced on oral, 98 (43%) started subcutaneous and switched to oral and 90 (40%) were treated with subcutaneous only. Matching and 'doubly robust' weighted regression models were based on the propensity score method, controlling for confounding-byindication bias. 11/23 pretreatment variables were different between the groups, but the propensity score modelling successfully balanced the treatment groups. Results: 76 children (34%) had sustained steroid-free remission with a difference that did not reach significance between the PO and the SC groups (weighted OR=1.72 (95% CI 0.5 to 5.9); p=0.52). There were no differences in need for treatment escalation (p=0.24), elevated liver enzymes (p=0.59) or nausea (p=0.85). Height velocity was lower in the PO group (p=0.006) and time to remission was delayed in the PO group (p=0.036; Fleming (0, 1) test). Conclusions: In this largest paediatric CD cohort to date, SC administered MTX was superior to PO, but only in some of the outcomes and with a modest effect size. Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider switching Zchildren in complete remission treated with subcutaneous MTX to the oral route with close monitoring of inflammatory markers and growth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954243731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307964
DO - 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307964
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25416066
AN - SCOPUS:84954243731
SN - 0017-5749
VL - 64
SP - 1898
EP - 1904
JO - Gut
JF - Gut
IS - 12
ER -