Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss?

H. Sohmer, H. Pratt, M. Feinmesser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Electrocochleography and evoked cortical potentials are both used in electric response audiometry. Both of these responses have been recorded for several years so that the authors are in a position to compare them and conclude that electrocochleography is a more useful clinical tool than the evoked response. Electrocochleographic waves are much less variable; they are not affected by sleep or sedatives; they can be recorded close to threshold and their nature, sources and pathways are better known.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-522
Number of pages8
JournalRevue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie
Volume95
Issue number7-8
StatePublished - 1974

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this