Abstract
We explore the distribution of polarity items in antecedents of VP ellipsis. We show that the data can be derived from (i) the assumption that parts of
polarity items are not interpreted in situ (cf., e.g., Lahiri 1998) and (ii) the standard
assumptions about parallelism in ellipsis licensing (e.g., Rooth 1992, Fox 2000).
polarity items are not interpreted in situ (cf., e.g., Lahiri 1998) and (ii) the standard
assumptions about parallelism in ellipsis licensing (e.g., Rooth 1992, Fox 2000).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 308-327 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Semantics and Linguistic Theory |
| Volume | 25 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held at Stanford University, May 15-17, 2015Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ellipsis, Parallelism, and Polarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver