Abstract
Finnish and Hebrew (in most tenses) share an unusual mixed subject omission pattern: the subject NP is optional in the first and second person but is generally required in the third person. A unified analysis of the two languages is developed in this paper, using certain proposals of Minimalism and a licensing principle which requires that both the specifier and the head position of a projection must be filled. In addition to the null subject pattern, Finnish and Hebrew differ both from traditional pro-drop and from non-pro-drop languages in the patterning of the agreement paradigm; the analysis developed here provides a connection between the mixed null subject pattern and the special agreement paradigm.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 613-671 |
Number of pages | 59 |
Journal | Natural Language and Linguistic Theory |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 1999 |