Ergodic theorems for nonconventional arrays and an extension of the szemerédi theorem

Yuri Kifer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper is primarily concerned with the asymptotic behavior as N → ∞ of averages of nonconventional arrays having the form N−1 Nn=1j=1 TPj(n,N)fj where fj’s are bounded measurable functions, T is an invertible measure preserving transformation and Pj’s are polynomials of n and N taking on integer values on integers. It turns out that when T is weakly mixing and Pj(n, N) = pjn + qjN are linear or, more generally, have the form Pj(n, N) = Pj(n) + Qj(N) for some integer valued polynomials Pj and Qj then the above averages converge in L2 but for general polynomials Pj of both n and N the L2 convergence can be ensured even in the “conventional” case = 1 only when T is strongly mixing while for > 1 strong 2-mixing should be assumed. Studying also weakly mixing and compact extensions and relying on Furstenberg’s structure theorem we derive an extension of Szemerédi’s theorem saying that for any subset of integers Λ with positive upper density there exists a subset NΛ of positive integers having uniformly bounded gaps such that for N ∈ NΛ and at least εN, ε > 0 of n’s all numbers pjn + qjN, j = 1, ..., , belong to Λ. We obtain also a version of these results for several commuting transformations which yields a corresponding extension of the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2687-2716
Number of pages30
JournalDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems- Series A
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences. All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

  • Multiple recurrence
  • Nonconventional averages
  • Szemerédi theorem
  • Triangular arrays

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ergodic theorems for nonconventional arrays and an extension of the szemerédi theorem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this